WASHINGTON: The World Health Organization (WHO) is reviewing finances and programme priorities following the U.S. decision to withdraw.
President Donald Trump announced the U.S. exit on his second term’s first day, criticizing the WHO’s pandemic handling.
The decision intensifies WHO’s financial issues, as noted by Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus in a January 23 memo.
Cost-Cutting Measures Initiated
To save costs, the WHO will suspend hiring for non-critical roles and significantly reduce travel expenses.
Office renovations will be paused unless linked to safety or previously approved under cost-saving strategies.
All meetings will default to virtual formats unless exceptional approval is granted for in-person gatherings.
U.S. Withdrawal Timeline and Dues
The U.S. will officially leave the WHO on January 22, 2026, following a one-year notice period, the U.N. confirmed.
A 1948 congressional resolution requires Washington to settle its financial dues to WHO before officially withdrawing.
The U.S., the WHO’s largest donor, contributes 18% of the organization’s total funding.
Financial Impact of U.S. Funding Freeze
WHO spokesperson Christian Lindmeier said the U.S. owes approximately $130 million in membership fees from January 2024.
The 2025 membership payment, due now, also remains unpaid, worsening the WHO’s financial strain.
U.S. funding includes voluntary contributions for specific programmes, which could end at any time.
WHO Funding and Reform Efforts
The WHO previously sought reforms, including increased mandatory fees and an investment round supported by member states.
Despite these efforts, Tedros emphasized the need for additional funding and deeper cost reductions to manage challenges.
Memo Highlights Measures to Protect Staff
The internal memo reassured staff that the WHO would do its utmost to protect and support them during this transition.
“These measures are only the beginning,” the memo noted, promising further cost-control actions in the future.
Global Health Priorities at Risk
Experts warn reduced funding could jeopardize critical health programmes and emergency responses worldwide.
As the WHO adapts to reduced resources, member states’ support will be crucial for maintaining global health efforts.
 is reviewing finances and programme priorities following the U.S. decision to withdraw.){kind=link}