WASHINGTON: The Pentagon announced Friday that it intends to reduce its civilian workforce by five to eight percent.
This decision will impact the military’s 950,000 civilian employees, with thousands expected to lose their jobs soon.
An initial wave of 5,400 probationary workers without “mission-critical” roles will be terminated next week.
These workers are a fraction of the 55,000 probationary employees at risk of being dismissed.
However, the overall cuts could significantly shrink the civilian workforce over time.
The eventual reduction could affect between 47,500 and 76,000 civilian employees.
Workforce Reduction
Acting Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness Darin Selnick confirmed the planned downsizing.
He stated the Pentagon aims to improve efficiency and focus on the President’s defense priorities.
The cuts are also intended to help restore military readiness and streamline operations.
Selnick emphasized that the process will be gradual, with several phases of dismissals.
The Defense Department is assessing which roles are essential before finalizing further layoffs.
Officials argue that reducing civilian staff will strengthen military effectiveness and resource allocation.
Initial Job Losses
The 5,400 employees losing their jobs next week are part of the first phase of terminations.
This phase primarily targets workers who have not yet completed their probationary period.
The Pentagon considers these positions non-essential and not directly tied to military operations.
Officials assure that national security operations will remain unaffected by these workforce reductions.
Further job cuts will depend on internal reviews and operational needs.
Long-Term Impact
If the full reduction occurs, up to 76,000 civilians could be let go.
This would be one of the most significant Pentagon workforce reductions in recent history.
The Defense Department faces challenges in balancing cost-cutting with maintaining essential support roles.
Some lawmakers and unions have expressed concerns about the scale of the layoffs.
Critics warn that cutting too many positions may impact logistical and administrative functions.
Military leaders insist the plan will improve efficiency without weakening support structures.
