Islamabad: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) expressed concern over the shutdown of businesses and public disruptions caused by the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf’s (PTI) protest and the government’s response to it. In a session held on Wednesday, IHC Chief Justice Aamer Farooq criticized both the government and the protesting party for their actions, emphasizing that fundamental rights had been ignored.
Context of the Protest
On November 13, PTI Chairman and former Prime Minister Imran Khan announced a “final call” for nationwide demonstrations, urging the restoration of his party’s electoral mandate and the release of incarcerated members, and the reversal of the 26th Amendment, which he claimed bolstered a “dictatorial regime.” The protest was scheduled for November 24, coinciding with a visit by the Belarusian president to Islamabad.
The IHC had previously ruled PTI’s planned protest unlawful, directing the government to maintain law and order while ensuring public life was not disrupted. However, widespread blockades were imposed across Islamabad, leading to severe disruptions.
Hearing Highlights
The hearing on Wednesday was initiated in response to a petition filed by Islamabad traders concerned about the economic fallout of the government’s measures during the protests. Key participants included Islamabad DSP Legal Sajid Cheema, state counsel Malik Abdul Rehman, and other representatives.
Justice Aamer Farooq questioned the basis behind the government’s decision to close the city, stating, “You were supposed to restore law and order, but you shut down the entire Islamabad.” He pointed out that the government had misinterpreted the court’s order by excessively restricting public and business activities.
The Chief Justice emphasized that while PTI’s actions were unlawful, the government’s approach also violated the fundamental rights of citizens, including business owners. He remarked, “What was the petitioners’ fault? Why were their businesses closed?”
Impact on the Capital
The city faced extensive disruptions due to the government’s preemptive measures:
- Road Closures: Major highways, city entrances, and roads connecting residential areas were sealed with containers.
- Business Losses: Markets, inter-provincial bus terminals, and guest houses were closed, leaving traders and daily wage workers in distress.
- Supply Chain Issues: Essential goods, including dairy, poultry, and vegetables, witnessed shortages.
- Educational Institutions: Schools and hostels were shut down, impacting students and their families.
The situation worsened in neighboring Rawalpindi, where the suspension of the metro bus service and heightened security disrupted daily life further.
Court’s Directive
Justice Farooq directed the interior ministry to submit a comprehensive report on the actions taken during the protest. He noted that even judges, including himself, were affected by the citywide shutdowns, humorously remarking, “I became the victim of my own order.”
The judge also highlighted the need for alternative solutions to manage protests without paralyzing the city. He urged both parties to prioritize the rights of common citizens over political agendas.
Clashes and Aftermath
The protest culminated on November 26, as PTI leaders and supporters arrived in Islamabad. However, clashes between protesters and security forces led to a chaotic day, with the PTI leadership retreating from the Red Zone early the next morning.
Conclusion
The IHC’s criticism of both the government and PTI underscores the need for balanced measures to handle political protests without compromising the public’s fundamental rights. The incident highlights the broader issue of governance and accountability in Pakistan, emphasizing the importance of dialogue and lawful measures in resolving political conflicts.
This situation serves as a reminder of the delicate balance required to protect democratic freedoms while maintaining public order.
