WASHINGTON: Vice President JD Vance dismissed concerns over newly published Signal chat messages involving Trump administration officials.
Vance, who was part of the text chain, echoed the administration’s stance, downplaying the significance of the messages.
He criticized The Atlantic’s editor-in-chief, Jeffrey Goldberg, for exaggerating the importance of the leaked texts.
In a Wednesday morning social media post, Vance argued that the publication overstated its findings.
“It’s very clear Goldberg oversold what he had,” Vance wrote after the messages were released.
Administration’s Defense
Vance’s statement aligns with Trump officials’ efforts to discredit the report and reassure the public.
Other members of the administration insist that the Signal messages contained no classified military plans.
They argue that the details revealed were not sensitive enough to threaten national security.
Trump officials maintain that the publication is attempting to create controversy over routine discussions.
They emphasize that military operations and security were never compromised by the chat.
Criticism Grows
Despite the pushback, critics argue that discussing military plans in unsecured chats raises security concerns.
Analysts say even non-classified information can be dangerous in the wrong hands.
Some worry that internal White House communication lacks proper security protocols.
Goldberg and The Atlantic continue to stand by their reporting, stating the messages expose a security risk.
Public reaction remains divided, with supporters defending the administration and opponents demanding accountability.
Political Fallout
The controversy adds to ongoing scrutiny of Trump officials’ handling of sensitive information.
Some lawmakers are calling for further investigation into the use of unsecured communication platforms.
Vance’s response suggests the administration is working to control the narrative on the leaks.
The debate over security practices within the White House is likely to continue.
For now, Vance and other officials insist there was no wrongdoing in the leaked discussions.
