White House Rescinds Order Freezing Federal Grants and Loans

Listen to this article The White House has officially rescinds an order that authorized a freeze on federal grants and...
White House rescinds order

Listen to this article

The White House has officially rescinds an order that authorized a freeze on federal grants and loans. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) issued this memo, causing widespread concern among millions dependent on government aid. The decision came after a judge temporarily halted the order on Tuesday, just hours after President Donald Trump signed it.

Background on the Order

The judge’s pause was in response to a lawsuit filed by organizations representing grant recipients. The new letter released by the White House on Wednesday stated, “OMB Memorandum M-25-13 is rescinded.” However, it remains unclear what prompted this sudden reversal of the order.

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt stated the administration is still pursuing a funding freeze. “This is NOT a rescission of the federal funding freeze. It is simply a rescission of the OMB memo,” she explained. This move aimed to eliminate confusion from the court’s injunction. She confirmed that the President will rigorously enforce his executive orders concerning federal funding.

Confusion and Public Outcry

Earlier in the week, the acting head of the White House budget office had directed agencies to “temporarily pause all activities related to obligations or disbursement of all federal financial assistance.” This pause was intended to allow the new administration to evaluate which grants and loans aligned with their agenda. However, the order led to significant confusion regarding the affected agencies and programs. Aid organizations warned of potential service suspensions after the online portal for accessing federal funds temporarily went offline.

The abrupt decision to rescind the order led to a shift in focus for the Democrats, who had initially planned a news conference on Trump’s proposal to end birthright citizenship. Senate Democratic Minority Leader Chuck Schumer criticized the freeze, stating that it was an unlawful attempt to harm families while aiding wealthy individuals. He emphasized that public outcry played a crucial role in halting the funding freeze. “I don’t think this would have happened except for the outcry throughout America,” Schumer remarked. He also urged Trump to withdraw his nominee to lead the OMB.

Impact on Federal Funding

The order was one of several initiatives by Trump aimed at reducing the size of the government and cutting federal spending. Other orders have targeted transgender rights and automatic citizenship for those born in the U.S. In a move to downsize the federal workforce, the Trump administration offered federal employees the option to resign while continuing to receive pay for eight months.

On Tuesday, Leavitt mentioned that the funding halt was a chance for governments to reduce spending on “woke” gender issues and diversity programs. Some states reported difficulties accessing funds through Medicaid, a program for low-income individuals. However, the White House later assured that Medicaid would not be impacted, nor would Social Security benefits or any program providing direct benefits to individuals, including the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), commonly known as food stamps.

Conclusion

Although the federal funding freeze order has been temporarily blocked, the White House believes the initial memo prompted federal agencies to comply with the President’s executive order. This situation underscores the ongoing tensions between the Trump administration and various stakeholders reliant on government aid. As the political landscape evolves, the ramifications of these actions will continue to unfold, affecting millions of Americans dependent on federal support.

  • About
    Pulse News

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Last Post

Categories

You May Also Like